LMNTRIX vs
Microsoft
Microsoft: Untrustworthy and Mediocre
Despite repeated assurances, Microsoft continues to face significant security challenges, with over 1,000 vulnerabilities reported each year. Issues related to suboptimal security architecture persist, raising risks for users. Furthermore, Microsoft’s system complexity, limited cloud functionality, underwhelming threat intelligence, and narrowly focused AI integration hinder its ability to provide a truly proactive defense strategy.
Detection
Hyperconverged Multi-tenanted Cyber Defense Platform
Designed from day inception as a Native XDR.
Natively unifies 12 detection capabilities into a single platform to detect threats across all threat vectors.
Ineffective threat detection
Adversaries are easily bypassing Microsoft security products, exploiting its outdated, signature-based AV, making them ineffective against modern attacks.
Lacking detection capability across multiple threat vectors including NDR, Packets, Cloud, Mobile, Attack Validation, and Darknet.
Deployment
Distributed and Multi-Tenant Design
Extensively validated for mission-critical environments.
Proven reliability and engineered for high redundancy.
Designed with multi-tenancy at its core, offering full control over deployment schedules and minimizing the need for frequent updates.
Complicated and Disjointed
Managing multiple consoles and dealing with an extended setup process makes the system challenging to operate.
Additionally, the limited support for various operating systems, including those from Microsoft, leads to significant operational difficulties.
All endpoints require the premium edition of the latest version of Windows, requiring upfront OS and hardware upgrades for full security functionality.
Architecture
Reliable and Lightweight Agent Ensures Continuous Operation
The modern agent is optimized for current threats, with restricted kernel access, primarily for visibility and anti-tampering purposes, while all modifications occur in user space. AI integration enhances threat detection and prevention.
Kernel updates are reserved for version upgrades, processed through Microsoft’s driver signing and undergo canary release testing to ensure stability.
Resource usage is efficient and transparent, minimizing impact on system performance.
Complex to operate, complex to maintain
Needs frequent OS-level upgrades increasing cost and operational burden.
Heavy operational workload often requires additional staff.
Security functionality is strewn across multiple disjointed consoles, fragmenting SOC workflows.
Essential features like threat analytics and server protection aren’t included in standard bundles, leading to unexpected license costs.
Frequent maintenance requires more dedicated staff.
Gartner warns that Microsoft’s security bundles “often [create] shelfware and redundant spending”.
Performance
Top-Ranked, Real-Time, and Autonomous
Offers complete protection and detection capabilities with proven real-world deployments. Boasts the industry’s lowest signal-to-noise ratio, ensuring you can focus on the most crucial tasks without distraction.
Zero client breaches
Inefficient and Reactive
Built on a foundation of obsolete, signature-based AV that is ineffective against modern adversaries resulting in one of the most breached solutions on the market.
Relying on scan-based detection can lead to significant resource drain, slowing down device performance and causing delays in identifying threats.
Security capabilities vary drastically across different OS editions and versions, creating inconsistent protections.
Gartner cautions Microsoft “is challenged by limited support for older OSs and generally uneven support across non-Windows OSs”.
Platform
Consolidate all your data within a unified location.
Streamline the ingestion and normalization of data from both internal and external sources into a single, centralized data repository called the LMNTRIX GRID.
Utilize AI-driven SIEM capabilities for real-time data streaming and employ Hyperautomation techniques to enhance the return on your investment.
Disconnected Data Management
Data fragmentation across multiple tools and consoles often creates significant challenges in achieving integration and unified visibility.
The limited flexibility in data ingestion processes, coupled with the higher costs associated with first-party data usage, can further hinder effective data management and analysis.
Additionally, relying on a single vendor for data management can significantly increase risk, as it limits adaptability and increases dependency on one source, which can become a critical point of failure.
AI
AI-Driven Immediate Protection
The LMNTRIX Aegis AI offers built-in AI capabilities that operate instantly, minimizing the need for frequent updates and allowing for the creation of generative AI-driven workflows.
Chatbots That Don’t Enhance Protection
On-device AI capabilities often fall short, proving weak and ineffective in providing robust cybersecurity defenses.
Additionally, reliance on signatures and rulesets requires constant updates to ensure smooth operation, which can lead to inefficiencies and potential vulnerabilities.
Moreover, limited integration of chatbots across different products results in siloed workflows, failing to deliver any meaningful detection or protection benefits. This lack of seamless integration not only hampers efficiency but also diminishes the overall security posture, making the chatbots more of a burden than a benefit.
Intelligence
Leading Threat and Spatial Intelligence
Integrated into the platform, this solution leverages top-tier threat intelligence, including feeds from 21 vendors such as Google, Emerging Threats, Talos as well as our own sensor network and 170+ open source feeds, ensuring comprehensive protection.
LMNTRIX Labs research together with the LMNTRIX Active Offense risk advisory services offer impactful geopolitical intelligence, enabling you to maintain a broad and effective security strategy.
Lack of Comprehensive Threat Intelligence
The platform’s built-in threat intelligence may fall short, often necessitating the integration of additional tools and services to achieve full protection. This fragmented approach can create security gaps and complicate the development of a unified threat management strategy.
Cloud
Leading Cloud Security Solution
The LMNTRIX XDR Platform, which is cloud-native and agentless, provides immediate protection (CSPM, CIEM, CDR, and ASPM) without needing kernel-level access. This approach reduces disruptions and utilizes advanced performance controls. It supports diverse environments, including public, private, hybrid, on-premises, and various workloads, even those without servers.
Limited Cloud Security Features
Microsoft Defender for Cloud has some limitations, including the absence of verified exploit path prioritization and detection capabilities for credential leakage in repositories. It also depends on agents for Kubernetes security and lacks integration for shift-left security with version control platforms.
MDR
All Inclusive MDR
As a leader in Managed Detection and Response (MDR) and one of the 20 vendors featured in the Gartner MDR Market Guide, we offer comprehensive protection.
Our service ensures full-spectrum response across your network, endpoints, identity, cloud, and mobile platforms. We eliminate the need for customer handoffs, saving time and reducing risk during attack remediation.
All our XDR subscriptions come with Unlimited DFIR, Containment & Remediation, and Proactive Threat Hunting at no additional cost.
With LMNTRIX, you can also eliminate the need for an Incident Response (IR) retainer, helping you save on fees while maintaining top-tier security.
Incomplete MDR
Lacks proactive threat hunting provided by security experts. Instead, Microsoft’s MDR relies on inadequate, generalized threat intelligence and AI.
Microsoft is missing entirely from the Gartner Market Guide for MDR 2024.
Microsoft’s MDR service is not included with their XDR offering and comes as a separate, often costly, add-on.
Customer Feedback
Source: TrustRadius, Quora, G2, Gartner Peer Review
False Positives
Generates a significant number of false positives, which can disrupt operations and require manual intervention.
Integration Challenges
Difficulties integrating with non-Microsoft devices and third-party security tools; adding devices can be challenging.
Resource Consumption
Can be resource-intensive, impacting system performance during scans and updates.
Limited Customization
Exclusions during scanning are hard to manage and spot, limiting customization options.
Complexity
Interface can be complex, requiring significant training to use effectively.
Mac and Linux Support
Limited support for Mac and Linux environments compared to Windows, affecting cross-platform usability.
Reporting and Analytics
Basic reporting features are limited; more detailed and customizable analytics options are desired by users.
Setup and Configuration
Initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for large organizations.
Protection
Requires extensive tuning, and continuously fails to deliver meaningful results in MITRE ATT&CK evaluations.
Detection
Requires extensive tuning with diminishing results, as recognized by underwhelming industry evaluations.
Remediation
Offers automatic remediation for a small subset of alerts. No automatic remediation on macOS or Linux.
Ease of Use
Microsoft’s capabilities are separated between different product consoles.
Protection Parity Across OSecs
Good protection on latest versions of Windows, but weak on legacy Windows, Linux and macOS.
Licensing
No standardized licensing rates per user or by usage across different products and services. Required add-ons and services for certain offerings
Auto Deployment
Requires manual deployments. Users will only receive a list of assets not running the solution.
- Vendor offers limited capability
- Optional cost - applies to MDR only
- Offered by Vendor
- Not offered by vendor
| MXDR – Features / Capabilities | Microsoft | LMNTRIX |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Feature | ||
| Behavioral Analytics and Protection | Y | Y |
| Automated Secops | N | Y |
| Containment and Remediation | O | Y |
| Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence | Y | Y |
| XDR Dahsboard/Portal | Y | Y |
| XDR Dahsboard/Portal Whitelabaleing + Custom URL | N | Y |
| SIEM Integration | Y | Y |
| Cloud-Based Solution | Y | Y |
| Compliance and Reporting | Y | Y |
| Data Sovereignty | Y | Y |
| Customer Specific Tenancy | Y | Y |
| Powerful Visualizations | Y | Y |
| MDR | ||
| 24 x 7 Monitoring | O | Y |
| End-to-End Platform & Tech Stack Management | Y | Y |
| Proactive Threat Hunting (endpoint+network) | O | Y |
| Active Threat Hunting (endpoint+network) | O | Y |
| Forensic Investigation (endpoint+network) | O | Y |
| False Positive Reduction | O | Y |
| Managed Remote Host Tactical Threat Containment | Y | Y |
| Managed Remote Network Tactical Threat Containment | Y | Y |
| Managed Remote Cloud-Based Threat Containment | Y | Y |
| Managed Remote Web Security Threat Containment | L | Y |
| Managed Remote Email Security Threat Containment | L | Y |
| Unlimited Remediation Support | N | Y |
| Automated Threat Response to Known Threats | Y | Y |
| Incident Response and Forensics | O | Y |
| Breach Warranty | N | N |
| Managed Security Services Support | Y | Y |
| Tech Stack | ||
| Multilayered endpoint protection | Y | Y |
| SIEM – NextGen SIEM (UBA, ML, Graph Analysis) | Y | Y |
| Packet Capture – Network forensics | N | Y |
| Attack Paths | N | Y |
| AD Audit – AD Topology Best Practices Report | N | Y |
| Endpoint Protection & Visibility (NGAV+EDR) | Y | Y |
| Network Visibility (NDR, Packets) | N | Y |
| Log Visibility (SIEM – on-premises & cloud) | Y | Y |
| Cloud Visibility (CSPM, CIEM, CDR) | Y | Y |
| Mobile Security (MTD) | Y | Y |
| Identity Protection | Y | Y |
| Automated Attack Validation (Automated PenTest) | N | Y |
| Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) | Y | Y |
| Device Control (USB) | Y | N |
| Local Host Firewall Management | Y | L |
| Deception Technology | Y | Y |
| Deep and Dark Web Intelligence | N | Y |
| Multi-Vector Detection | L | Y |
| Operational Technology: SCADA/ICS Support | Y | Y |
| Cloud Security Analytics | Y | Y |
| Threat Intelligence Feeds | Y | Y |
| Attack Surface Reduction | Y | Y |
| Next-Generation Signatureless AV Protection | Y | Y |
| Vulnerability Management | Y | N |
| Vulnerability Scanning | Y | N |
| Patch Management | N | N |
| Sandboxing | Y | Y |
Retail 1B-3B USD
Media 1B-3B USD
Mininf 30B+ USD
